<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ajgraham.com - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-d19d5762" type="application/json"/><link>http://ajgrahamcom.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://ajgrahamcom.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:42:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Checking Java version and installing via batch file/command line</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2009/12/checking-java-version-and-installing-via-batch-filecommand-line/#comment-303695694</link><description>Very nice post!&lt;br&gt;I was looking for something like this today and there it is!&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hugo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking Email Signature click throughs</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2010/05/tracking-analytics-by-email-campaign/#comment-58486756</link><description>I feel it is more convenient to convert all those links into &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; links so only nice short URLs appear in the email - especially for the text-only version those long conversion tracking links seem a bit overkill.&lt;br&gt;Through some shortening service you'll still be able to track the same things  + it looks less suspicious (at least at the current point of time)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; e.g. has a simple API in case you would want to auto-generate those links.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulwehle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:57:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adjusting Google Chromes default search to English</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2010/02/changing-google-chromes-default-search-to-english/#comment-55341346</link><description>you may set your homepage to &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/ncr" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.google.com/ncr&lt;/a&gt; in order to permanently enjoy that</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO analysis for dummies: links</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2010/01/seo-analysis-for-dummies-links/#comment-55341326</link><description>I should have been more specific with the title, I've updated it now. This was an edited bit of advice I sent to a friend who manages his own website, and as I had wanted to put something on here about SEO I decided it was easier to start with something I had already written...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:32:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO analysis for dummies: links</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2010/01/seo-analysis-for-dummies-links/#comment-55341323</link><description>I think such basic SEO audit should start from onsite characteristics like titles, descriptions, web copy, semantics, interlinking and then move on the backlinks, popularity etc offline factors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeoKungFu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The problem with using the Google Maps API for UK addresses</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2009/09/the-problem-with-using-the-google-maps-api-for-uk-addresses/#comment-55341317</link><description>Managed to get a chance to test MultiMap Postcode lookup on one of there &lt;a href="http://www.multimap.com/openapidocs/1.2/demos/multi_input_geocoding.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;API pages&lt;/a&gt;. It handles Postcodes very well from what I can see. Looked through most of the demos they have, and although they have some showcasing routing, none show point A to point B using postcode inputs which seemed odd as that is surely the most common usage? I'll try and make something from the API and post the code in another post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The problem with using the Google Maps API for UK addresses</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2009/09/the-problem-with-using-the-google-maps-api-for-uk-addresses/#comment-55341312</link><description>Hi Zed,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback, always appreciated :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've not used MultiMap before, at least not via their API, I did check out Microsoft Live Maps (which now redirects to MultiMap, which seems odd, see: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#United_Kingdom" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#United_Kingdom&lt;/a&gt;). I will try it out in the next few days as if the limit is 50,000 transactions a year, and the functionality is good then it will serve most small/medium businesses perfectly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the tip :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The problem with using the Google Maps API for UK addresses</title><link>http://www.ajgraham.com/2009/09/the-problem-with-using-the-google-maps-api-for-uk-addresses/#comment-55341310</link><description>Hi Alex&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the article. It helps explain why google's API does not give accurate results when using full postcode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Multimap seem to also offer free embedded maps (limit of 50,000 transactions/year). Have you tried their service? do you think results will be accurate when using full postcode? or is the problem linked to the PAF uniform across all free mapping platforms?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zed</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:14:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
